Ms.Lown stated in her letter that as a result of the last audit is was recommended that the supervisor review the bank reconciliations, which I find to be a red flag. After being in the position since 1986, with so many years of experience, an auditor is now recommending that the Supervisor sign off on her work. Did the Supervisor sign off on her work prior to the 2006 audit? Could this recommendation be as a result that there were errors found during the audit that Ms. Lown had made or could it be that she exercised too much authority (though she was bookkeeper and not a Comptroller)? I'm sure anyone with a background in finance can make an assumption as to why this was recommended.
In any case, the recommendation indicates that her work needed to be verified and required supervision.
In any case, the recommendation indicates that her work needed to be verified and required supervision.
RSS Feed