Looks like the McArthurs use the same attorneys that have represented them in legal matters use them to oversee the vote in the last Repubican caucus.
And why did Yancy sue Pompey?
WebCivil Supreme - Case Detail
Court: Dutchess Civil Supreme Index Number: 005647/2003 Case Name: MCARTHUR, YANCY F. ET AL. vs. DELAFIELD, POMPEY ET AL. Case Type: Other ("Not One Of The Above") Track: Standard RJI Filed: 11/19/2003 Date NOI Due: NOI Filed: Disposition Date: 12/22/2003 Calendar Number: Jury Status: Justice Name: JAMES D. PAGONES
Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff: JOHN CIAMPOLI, ESQ Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active 99 WASHINGTON AVE
ALBANY, NY 12210 (518) 436-3866 Attorney/Firm For Defendant: PRO SE Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active SEE COMMENT SCREEN FOR NAME
ADDRESS & PHONE NO.
And why did Yancy sue Pompey?
WebCivil Supreme - Case Detail
Court: Dutchess Civil Supreme Index Number: 005647/2003 Case Name: MCARTHUR, YANCY F. ET AL. vs. DELAFIELD, POMPEY ET AL. Case Type: Other ("Not One Of The Above") Track: Standard RJI Filed: 11/19/2003 Date NOI Due: NOI Filed: Disposition Date: 12/22/2003 Calendar Number: Jury Status: Justice Name: JAMES D. PAGONES
Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff: JOHN CIAMPOLI, ESQ Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active 99 WASHINGTON AVE
ALBANY, NY 12210 (518) 436-3866 Attorney/Firm For Defendant: PRO SE Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active SEE COMMENT SCREEN FOR NAME
ADDRESS & PHONE NO.